Tag Archives: Andrew Sullivan

Lessons from a Blogger

Picture of blogger, columnist and author Andrew Sullivan.

Famed blogger Andrew Sullivan has changed the media landscape as we know it more than once in his career. He appears to be on the brink of doing it again.

Famed blogger Andrew Sullivan has decided to leave The Daily Beast and go it alone, starting his own blog and charging subscriptions.

What does this have to do with the future of Cooperative Extension?  Everything.

Think for a moment about the implications of this in terms of traditional media.  As Mathew Ingram observed recently, if one of the nation’s preeminent bloggers can leave an online publication such as the Daily Beast and strike out on his own, who’s to say that other premiere bloggers and columnists —the New York Times’ Nate Silver and Thomas Friedman, for example — won’t soon follow?

As Ingram asks rather ominously, “at what point does it become more of a hindrance than a benefit to be associated with a traditional media brand?”

Within only days after announcing his split, Sullivan raised more $300,000 dollars for his new site.  More recently, he’s drawn closer to the $500,000 million mark.  There is every reason to believe that Sullivan, distinguished by his long history of media trailblazing, is once again primed to change the media landscape.

What we’re talking about here is creative destructionism on crack.  The arrival of new media a generation ago thoroughly democratized media usage partly by drastically lowering entry costs.

New media have empowered gifted writers such as Sullivan — good writers who also aren’t afraid to think out of the box and to challenge conventional thinking — to strike out on their own.

Small wonder why I and others get so frustrated with the people in our ranks who view new media adoption as just another skill set that must be added to one’s professional repertoire simply to pass muster at the next performance appraisal review.

They don’t understand how these new media are reordering everything in their wake, not only communications and business but every facet of our lives.

Within higher education, we’re already getting a taste what’s in store for us with the steady growth of Massive Online Open Courses.

That raises a rather fascinating but troubling question.  To paraphrase, Ingram, how much longer will it be before the majority of aspiring students view conventional higher education as a hindrance more than a benefit?

The skeptical colleagues in our ranks must understand that Cooperative Extension is no more immune to the effects of new media than any other facet of education.

I’ll leave my readers with another question: At what point will traditional Cooperative Extension programming and delivery methods be viewed more as hindrances than benefits?

To put it another way, how much longer before a handful of aspiring Extension educators strike out on their own and develop an outreach version of MOOCs?

The next time some of our Extension colleagues bang on about how all this talk of new media is wasting their time, they need to be gently — or, perhaps, not so gently — reminded of this new reality.

The Cooperative Extension Educator as Sentinel

A Journal of Extension article by three land-grant university faculty members has caused something of a stir within Cooperative Extension circles — and well it should.

The three expressed the fear — an entirely justified fear — that Extension is going the way of the Pony Express.   The Pony Express once represented the cutting edge of mail delivery until the advent of the telegraph and the construction of the transcontinental railroad changed all that.

Likewise, in its halcyon days, the U.S. Cooperative Extension system served as cutting-edge educational model for developed and developing nations alike.  Much like the Pony Express, though, the Extension model is becoming increasingly irrelevant due to a number of factors — especially the rising levels of education within most of its client base.

This, in turn, has led to flagging confidence in Extension’s value among federal, state and local funding sources.  

What is to be done? 

Cooperative Extension, they contend, is badly in need of redefinition — an effort that may result in the loss of some of Extension’s traditional client base, though the authors stress that Extension must retain its traditional approach among its existing client base even as it presses ahead with efforts to reach new audiences.

Marketing, they contend is equally critical.  One of the first steps should be an extensive survey to determine Extension’s “modern-day niche.”

Finally, the authors stress the importance of “rigorous communication and education.”  Extension pioneered many communications technologies throughout its history, but its next challenge lies in developing programs and products grounded in current communication and educational theory.

Likewise, Extension educators steeped in subject-matter expertise nonetheless possess inadequate training in education, communication, psychology and other fields that that are paramount to the success of the Extension mission, they contend.

Needless to say, all of these concerns are valid, but I think they are overlooking the two most critical factors: The rise of globalization and, equally significant, the advent of social media, both of which will directly affect the way Extension educators undertake their mission in the future.

Simply put, Extension educators are operating within an entirely new environment, which author and New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman aptly describes as the flat world.

On this radically “flattened” landscape, change is literally occurring at the speed of light as knowledge is rapidly moved across oceans and entire contents through emerging Web-based media. 

These changes will require nothing less than the redefinition of the Cooperative Extension educator — how he/she interacts with clientele within the flat world environment.

Extension educators already are being forced to move beyond their traditional venues of face-to-face contacts and print and broadcast media — 20th century methods of knowledge transfer.   But the changes will be even more far reaching.

A growing number of Extension educators are beginning to realize that they no longer can afford to be mere knowledge providers — a task for which Google and other search engines are now fully equipped.  Rather they must strive to become value-added knowledge providers —sentinels, in manner of speaking.

I draw my lessons from the blogging phenomenon that has unfolded within the last decade.  

As a political junkie of sorts, one of the first Websites sites I visit every mornng is Andrew Sullivan’s Weblog, The Daily Dish. Sullivan has succeeded spectacularly as a blogger through the role he serves as a sentinel.   He informs readers and endows them with a deep historical and philosophical understanding of the passing political scene but he also does something more:  He provides his readers with a reasonable expectation of what may happen next — an understanding of the political and cultural events that lie just beyond the horizon.

Simply put, along with knowledge,  he strives to provide the deepest possible context.  And by providing unusually deep context, Sullivan has succeeded not only as a knowledge provider but also as a value-added knowledge provider.

Cooperative Extension educators are faced with the same challenges.  To compete successfully within this flat world, we must become sentinels — value-added knowledge providers who are fully equipped to use social media to empower our clients not only with knowledge but also knowledge within an especially deep context.

To their credit, a growing number of Extension educators already are fully aware of what is at stake. In my state, for example, our precision farming team already has adopted this new sentinel model successfully.  They are viewed among their clients as cutting-edge sources of knowledge about precision farming.  But they are also are taking the next critical step, learning how to use social media and other Web-based technologies to provide their clients with daily insights and commentary about emerging technologies and practices. 

They are becoming value-added knowledge providers, because they know that within this increasingly flat world, their future — and the future of the Cooperative Extension mission — depends on it.